From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Exp. Dev. Canada v. E.S.E. Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02967 BRO(RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-02967 BRO(RAOx)

09-08-2017

EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CANADA, Plaintiff, v. E.S.E. ELECTRONICS, INC. and DAVID KAZEMI, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

This case was tried to the Court on August 1-2, 2017. The Court entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on September 5, 2017. Dkt. No. 208. In accordance with the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff Export Development Canada against defendant E.S.E. Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $333,410.89, which includes principal of $226,586.31 and prejudgment interest at eighteen percent (18%) per annum from January 24, 2015 through September 6, 2017. Post-judgment interest will continue to accrue at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per annum (i.e., $164.42 per day) until this judgment is fully paid. Export Development Canada shall have immediate execution on this judgment.

2. Export Development Canada is also entitled to attorneys' fees under Cal. Com. Code § 2207 and may file a motion fixing the amount of those fees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2) within twenty-eight (28) days of the entry of this judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2017

/s/_________

Honorable Beverly Reid O'Connell

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Exp. Dev. Canada v. E.S.E. Elecs. Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2017
Case No. 2:16-cv-02967 BRO(RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Exp. Dev. Canada v. E.S.E. Elecs. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CANADA, Plaintiff, v. E.S.E. ELECTRONICS, INC. and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2017

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-02967 BRO(RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2017)

Citing Cases

Anderson v. Equinox Holdings, Inc.

65. Plaintiff offered credible evidence to support her claim for mileage reimbursement for 172 miles per year…