From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campo v. Nardone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

October 21, 1964


The plaintiffs moved for examination on the subjects appearing in paragraphs numbered 1 through 8 of their notice of motion. The motion was granted as to paragraphs 1 and 2 and denied on the ground of irrelevancy as to the remaining six paragraphs. On this appeal the plaintiffs have abandoned 8. The defendant is a lawyer who represented both buyer and seller in a real estate transaction. He is sued for misrepresentation. The plaintiffs were the buyers. In view of the defendant's unusual fiduciary relationship we think a more liberal view should have been taken. Order modified by granting examination also as to paragraphs 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Campo v. Nardone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 21, 1964
22 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Campo v. Nardone

Case Details

Full title:BENJAMIN CAMPO et al., Appellants, v. MICHAEL NARDONE, Respondent, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1964

Citations

22 A.D.2d 716 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)