From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campo v. Acosta

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 3, 1941
200 So. 305 (La. 1941)

Opinion

No. 35924.

January 6, 1941. Rehearing Denied February 3, 1941.

Appeal from Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Bernard; Paul Debaillon, Judge.

A. Giffen Levy, of New Orleans, and Bruce Nunez, of St. Bernard, for plaintiffs and appellees.

R.A. Dowling, of New Orleans (Neil Armstrong, Jr., of New Orleans, of counsel), for defendant and appellant.


This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a general election contest.

This case and the cases of Andrew Nunez et al. v. A.J. Plaisance, La.Sup., 200 So. 302, and Omer Perez v. Lawrence Hurstell, La.Sup., 200 So. 305, were consolidated for the hearing of the appeals because identical issues were presented. The cases differ only in that different offices are involved. In each of them the defendant received more votes at the general election, by the voters writing in his name, than the plaintiff, whose name was printed on the ballot.

We have recited and discussed the issues presented in all of these cases in our opinion handed down this day in the case of Andrew Nunez et al. v. A.J. Plaisance, La.Sup., 200 So. 302,fn1 and for the reasons stated therein the judgment in this case is reversed and set aside; accordingly, the suit is dismissed at appellees' cost.


Summaries of

Campo v. Acosta

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 3, 1941
200 So. 305 (La. 1941)
Case details for

Campo v. Acosta

Case Details

Full title:FRANK J. CAMPO ET AL. v. BEN ACOSTA

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 3, 1941

Citations

200 So. 305 (La. 1941)
200 So. 305

Citing Cases

Williams v. Ragland

The right to become a candidate for election to public office is a valuable and fundamental right.…

Serpas v. Trebucq

In each of the others, as in this, there was judgment for the contestant, and in each of the others there has…