From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 13, 1979
371 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 79-453.

June 13, 1979.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, William C. Williams, III, J.

Jose G. Rodriguez of Montgomery, Lytal, Reiter, Denney Searcy, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a summary denial of a motion to vacate judgment and sentence filed under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court held the motion and the files and records in the case conclusively show the prisoner/petitioner is entitled to no relief and thus denied an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record before us and have determined there is sufficient question raised as to whether the petitioner intelligently and voluntarily entered his plea of guilty with full knowledge of the consequences of the plea and with complete understanding of the nature and consequences of the plea of guilty.

The summary order denying the motion to vacate is reversed and this cause remanded for hearing on the petition. Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, C.J., and CROSS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Campi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 13, 1979
371 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Campi v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALDO CAMPI, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 13, 1979

Citations

371 So. 2d 1085 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

I do not believe, therefore, that it can be said that the record shows "conclusively that the appellant is…