Opinion
Civil Action No. 07 — 168J.
June 4, 2008
ORDER
On July 5, 2007, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. no. 1) and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.
The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 9), filed on May 9, 2008, recommended that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied due to Petitioner's failure to have exhausted his administrative remedies. Petitioner was served with the Report and Recommendation and was advised he was allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.
After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2008;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 9) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated May 9, 2008, is adopted as the opinion of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.