From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 31, 1968
401 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 25657.

September 27, 1968. Rehearing Denied October 31, 1968.

Kenneth Tekell, Houston, Tex., for appellant.

James R. Gough and Donald L. Stone, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for appellee.

Before GEWIN, PHILLIPS and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

Harry Phillips, of the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.


Charles Calvin Campbell was found guilty by a jury under a two-count indictment charging that he transported in interstate commerce two falsely made and altered customer's drafts with knowledge that they were falsely made and altered in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314. He was sentenced to ten years imprisonment under each count, the sentences to run concurrently. We affirm.

Appellant's sole specification of error is that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. His defense was conducted by retained counsel of his own choosing. Although the record reveals counsel's inexperience as a trial lawyer and his unfamiliarity with certain rules of evidence and trial procedure, we conclude that when measured by the applicable standard, appellant's representation was adequate. Where inadequacy of counsel is alleged, relief may be obtained only when representation is so inadequate as to make the trial a farce and a mockery of justice, United States v. Garguilo, 324 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1963), or when there has been a denial of fundamental fairness, Brubaker v. Dickson, 310 F.2d 30 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 978, 83 S.Ct. 1110, 10 L.Ed.2d 143 (1963).

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Campbell v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 31, 1968
401 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Campbell v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Charles Calvin CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 31, 1968

Citations

401 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. State

This claim is not supported by the record. See Foster v. Beto, 412 F.2d 892 (5th Cir. 1969); Campbell v.…

State v. Caffey

Benson v. State Board of Parole and Probation, supra. Relief may be had on the ground of inadequacy of…