From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Hurst

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2024
3:24-cv-154-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-cv-154-DPM

12-02-2024

RICKEY L. CAMPBELL ADC #178023 PLAINTIFF v. THOMAS HURST, Warden, Calico Unit, ADC; CLAUDIA HARRIS, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC; and THOMAS ROLLIN, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, ADC DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

On de novo review, the Court adopts the recommendation, Doc. 4, and overrules Campbell's objections, Doc. 7. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3). Campbell's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. Strike recommended. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Hurst

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Dec 2, 2024
3:24-cv-154-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Campbell v. Hurst

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY L. CAMPBELL ADC #178023 PLAINTIFF v. THOMAS HURST, Warden, Calico…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 2, 2024

Citations

3:24-cv-154-DPM (E.D. Ark. Dec. 2, 2024)