From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Campbell v. Head

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 15, 2021
Civil Action 2:21-CV-137 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-CV-137

09-15-2021

ADRIAN CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN G HEAD, Respondent.


ORDER

NELVA GONZALES RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Petitioner's “Written Objection to Recommendation to Dismiss Case” (D.E. 9). Petitioner asserts that he has paid the filing fee and that his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. On September 2, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued his Order (D.E. 7), withdrawing the memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 6) to which Petitioner objects, having already acknowledged that the filing fee was paid, but had been delayed in docketing. Consequently, the Court OVERRULES the objection as moot. The case will not be dismissed for failure to prosecute because the recommendation to do so has been withdrawn.


Summaries of

Campbell v. Head

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Sep 15, 2021
Civil Action 2:21-CV-137 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Campbell v. Head

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN CAMPBELL, Petitioner, v. WARDEN G HEAD, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 2:21-CV-137 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 15, 2021)