Opinion
No. 04-57140.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed February 12, 2007.
Craig E. Lindberg, Esq., The Williams Law Firm, PC, Newport Beach, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant and for Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant.
Jeffrey A. Rosenfeld, Esq., DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary, US LLP, Catherine D. Meyer, Esq., Pillsbury Madison, et al., LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Elizabeth A. Kendrick, Esq., Keesal Young Logan, Long Beach, CA, for Defendants.
Lawrence C. Meyerson, Esq., Lawrence C. Meyerson, A P.L.C., Beverly Hills, CA, for Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-03-09309-R.
Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
After a de novo review, there was sufficient admissible evidence in the district court's file to establish that there were no genuine issues of material fact. See Carmen v. S.F. Unified School Dist., 237 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2001).
Therefore, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.