Opinion
2:21-cv-00581-JCM-VCF
04-04-2023
JENNIFER CAMPAGNA, an individual, Plaintiff, v. ARROWEYE SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation; MICA MOSELEY, an individual; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES, I through X, inclusive, Defendants.
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LINH HUA, ESQ. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13285 Attorneys for Defendants, Arroweye Solutions, Inc. and Mica Moseley HONE LAW JILL GARCIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7805 Attorney for Plaintiff, Jennifer Campagna
GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI
LINH HUA, ESQ. (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
DIONE C. WRENN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 13285
Attorneys for Defendants, Arroweye Solutions, Inc. and Mica Moseley
HONE LAW
JILL GARCIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7805
Attorney for Plaintiff, Jennifer Campagna
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS ARROWEYE SOLUTIONS, INC. AND MICA MOSELEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(SECOND REQUEST)
Defendants ARROWEYE SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Arroweye”) and MICA MOSELEY (“Moseley”) (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their attorneys, Linh T. Hua, Esq. and Dione C. Wrenn, Esq. of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani LLP, and Plaintiff JENNIFER CAMPAGNA (“Plaintiff”), by and through her attorney, Jill Garcia, Esq. of Hone Law, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) on January 17, 2023 [ECF No. 66].
2. On March 7, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants' Motion [ECF No. 73]. By way of stipulation, the parties agreed to the deadline on which Plaintiff filed her opposition. See ECF Nos. 67, 69, and 70.
3. On March 21, 2023, the Parties submitted a stipulation and proposed order to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their reply in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment from March 21, 2023 to April 4, 2023. See ECF No. 74.
4. The Court granted the proposed order. See ECF No. 75.
5. Defense counsel's schedule is severely compacted due to providing substantive assistance in an ongoing trial that is currently in its seventh week of testimony as well as providing coverage on other cases for the lead trial attorney.
6. Defendants request additional time, up to and including Friday, April 14, 2023, to file their reply in support of the Motion.
7. This is Defendants second and final request for an extension of the reply deadline, and it is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.
8. Plaintiff does not oppose Defendants' requested extension.
9. Accordingly, Defendants will file their reply in support of the Motion on Friday, April 14, 2023.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.