From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camlibel v. Pattiz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 17, 2015
5:14-cv-2231-SVW (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2015)

Opinion

          Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present.

          Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present.


         

          Honorable STEPHEN V. WILSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

         Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS ORDER DISMISSING Case WITH PREJUDICE

         On November 10, 2014, this Court dismissed without prejudice Plaintiff's claim for lack of jurisdiction. (Dkt. 6.) Because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, on January 13, 2015, the Court acted on its own motion and ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Dkt. 9.) On January 26, 2015, Plaintiff filed a response to the Court's order. (Dkt. 10.)

         The Court considered Plaintiff's response and finds that Plaintiff fails to show why the case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. For the foregoing reasons, the Court acting on its own motion DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's claim.


Summaries of

Camlibel v. Pattiz

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Feb 17, 2015
5:14-cv-2231-SVW (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Camlibel v. Pattiz

Case Details

Full title:Ismet Okyay Camlibel v. Cathy Lee Pattiz

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 17, 2015

Citations

5:14-cv-2231-SVW (DTBx) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2015)