From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

May, 1934.


Judgment dismissing plaintiff's complaint reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. We are of opinion that plaintiff established a prima facie case of negligence against both defendants, the proof showing that the falling object came from above where plaintiff was working and where alone the employees of defendant Lieder Construction Co., Inc., were engaged, and that the spaces on all of the floors above the sixth floor to the tenth, where the iron workers were engaged, were open and unprotected in violation of the Labor Law (§ 241, subd. 4) and section 195 of the Building Code of the city of New York, the duty of seeing that such protection was afforded being upon the general contractor, defendant Matthews Construction Co., Inc. We are of the further opinion that despite the fact that plaintiff appeared to have had some prior accidents of a character similar to the one now complained of, the question of his credibility and the extent of his injury, if any, was one of fact and not of law. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Caminiti v. Matthews Construction Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH CAMINITI, Appellant, v. MATTHEWS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 879 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Wolinetz v. Treib, Inc.

Defendant William Treib, Inc., was the general contractor; defendant Gigliano was the subcontractor doing the…

Ostapenko v. Am. Bridge Div. of U.S. Steel

Counsel seeking specific instructions to a jury on a particular matter must submit timely requests for such…