From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cameron v. Swartz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 21, 2020
2:17-CV-00816-AJS (W.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2020)

Opinion

2:17-CV-00816-AJS

12-21-2020

DARYL EUGENE CAMERON, Plaintiff, v. CARLA SWARTZ, MANAGER, E UNIT; STEVE CHRISTINI, COUNSELOR, EA UNIT; MS. HUMBERT, COUNSELOR, AB UNIT; MS. COWAN, MANAGER, A UNIT; SGT. GIBSON, 2-10 SHIFT A UNIT; SGT. BOWLIN, 2-10 E UNIT; AND CO STICKLY, EA UNIT 2-10 PM SHIFT; Defendants

cc: Daryl Eugene Cameron LM 0524 SCI Somerset 1590 Walters Mill Road Somerset, PA 15510-0001 Pro Se Via US First Class Mail Counsel for Defendants (Via CM/ECF electronic mail)



Magistrate Judge Lisa P. Lenihan ECF No. 61 MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff initiated this pro se civil rights action on June 20, 2017, and the Complaint was docketed on Agusut 1, 2017. (ECF No. 7.) The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 86), filed on November 19, 2020, recommended that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 61) filed by Defendants Carla Swartz, Steve Christini, Ms. Humbert, Ms. Cowan, Sgt. Gibson, Sgt. Bowlin, Co Stickly, be granted. Service was made on Plaintiff via first class mail to his address of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections, and that unregistered ECF users were given an additional three (3) days pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d). No objections have been filed.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2020

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 61) filed by Defendants Carla Swartz, Steve Christini, Ms. Humbert, Ms. Cowan, Sgt. Gibson, Sgt. Bowlin, CO Stickly is

GRANTED as to Defendants Swartz, Christini, Bowlin. and Stickly, and

DENIED as to Defendants Humbert, Cowan, and Gibson;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall terminate Defendants Swartz, Christini, Bowlin. and Stickly from the case;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 86) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated November 19, 2020, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

BY THE COURT:

s/Arthur J. Schwab

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge cc: Daryl Eugene Cameron

LM 0524

SCI Somerset

1590 Walters Mill Road

Somerset, PA 15510-0001

Pro Se

Via US First Class Mail

Counsel for Defendants

(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)


Summaries of

Cameron v. Swartz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 21, 2020
2:17-CV-00816-AJS (W.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Cameron v. Swartz

Case Details

Full title:DARYL EUGENE CAMERON, Plaintiff, v. CARLA SWARTZ, MANAGER, E UNIT; STEVE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 21, 2020

Citations

2:17-CV-00816-AJS (W.D. Pa. Dec. 21, 2020)