From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cameron v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 21, 1929
277 P. 917 (Okla. 1929)

Opinion

No. 18858

Opinion Filed May 21, 1929.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Failure to File Brief — Affirmance with Judgment on Supersedeas Bond.

Where the plaintiff in error fails to comply with the rules of this court requiring the filing of briefs, and said appeal is subject to dismissal for want of prosecution, and where motion has been filed in this court to affirm the judgment and enter judgment on the supersedeas bond against the sureties thereon, and a copy of the supersedeas bond upon which judgment is sought is incorporated in the record in this court, this court will affirm the judgment and render judgment on the supersedeas bond.

Appeal from District Court, Jackson County; Frank Mathews, Judge.

Action by W. J. McDaniel and another against Clarence Cameron. From the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Robinson Oden, for plaintiff in error.

L. A. Pelley, for defendants in error.


This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Jackson county in an action wherein the defendants in error, W. J. McDaniel and C. C. Devore, as plaintiffs, recovered a judgment against Clarence Cameron for the sum of $182.50, with interest thereon from the 29th day of October, 1926, and from which judgment plaintiff in error, on October 26, 1927, lodged his appeal in this court.

The plaintiff in error has failed to file briefs as required by rule 7 of the rules of this court, and no showing has been made why he has failed to file briefs, herein, although the time for filing briefs in this cause expired on the 8th day of February, 1928. The defendants in error, on the 4th day of May, 1929, filed in this cause their motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court and to render judgment against the sureties on the supersedeas bond executed by the plaintiff in error.

It appears from the record in this cause that a copy of the supersedeas bond is incorporated therein, and on which bond W. M. Ingram and Earnest Banks appear as sureties.

Where the plaintiff in error fails to comply with the rules of this court requiring the filing of briefs, the appeal is subject to dismissal, and where a proper motion has been made for judgment on supersedeas bond against the sureties thereon, and it appears that the supersedeas bond has been given, filed, and approved, and that the same is set out in the case-made, this court will affirm the judgment of the trial court and render judgment on such bond. Stepp v. Turner, 83 Okla. 139, 200 P. 994; Jacobs v. Eclipse Paint Manufacturing Co., 93 Okla. 187, 219 P. 705.

It is therefore ordered and decreed by the court that the judgment of the trial court in this cause be affirmed, and the defendants in error, W. J. McDaniel and C. C. Devore, have judgment against the said Clarence Cameron, W. M. Ingram, and Earnest Banks in the sum of $182.50, together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 29th day of October, 1926, until paid.

CLARK, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Cameron v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 21, 1929
277 P. 917 (Okla. 1929)
Case details for

Cameron v. McDaniel

Case Details

Full title:CAMERON v. McDANIEL et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 21, 1929

Citations

277 P. 917 (Okla. 1929)
277 P. 917

Citing Cases

Weeks v. Goldstein

This is clearly a case where the county court was without power to determine and fix the conflicting rights…

Jacobs v. National Bank of Commerce of Tulsa

Where plaintiff in error fails to comply with the rules of this court requiring the filing of briefs, the…