From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cameron v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 27, 2013
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-842-TMH [wo] (M.D. Ala. Sep. 27, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-842-TMH [wo]

2013-09-27

JIMMY FRANK CAMERON, AIS#105591, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD ALLEN, et al., Defendants.


OPINION and ORDER

On August 19, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. No. 73). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED, that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the costs of this proceeding be taxed against Plaintiff.

____________________

TRUMAN M. HOBBS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cameron v. Allen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 27, 2013
CASE NO. 2:10-cv-842-TMH [wo] (M.D. Ala. Sep. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Cameron v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY FRANK CAMERON, AIS#105591, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD ALLEN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:10-cv-842-TMH [wo] (M.D. Ala. Sep. 27, 2013)

Citing Cases

Mcelwain v. Escambia Cnty.

The law in the Eleventh Circuit is clear, however, that a “difference in medical opinion between the…

Franklin v. Nousiainen

Harris, 941 F.2d at 1505; see also Cameron v. Allen, No. 2:10-CV-00842, 2013 WL 5441774,…