Opinion
Argued May 22d 1935.
Decided October 9th, 1935.
Deceased's direction in her will that her executor pay her funeral expenses made it his primary duty to do so, but neither such payment, nor the direction in her will was a waiver of the right to have her husband's estate make reimbursement where his will directed that on the death her remains be interred beside him in the family vault, and her funeral expenses paid out of his estate.
On appeal from a decree advised by Vice-Chancellor Davis, who filed a memorandum of decision not reported.
Mr. David R. Rose, for the appellants.
Mr. Thomas M. Farr, for the respondents.
Isaac A. Lee by his will directed that on the death of his wife her remains be interred by his side in the family vault, and her funeral expenses paid out of his estate. She survived him over twenty years, and died in 1933 leaving a will containing among other provisions the common clause directing her executor to pay debts and funeral expenses. The will named the complainant-respondent as executor. The remains of Mrs. Lee were interred as directed in her husband's will, the respondent paid the funeral expenses in the first instance and claimed reimbursement from the husband's estate, which being refused, it filed the bill in this case based on that claim with others.
The vice-chancellor properly held that complainant's primary duty was to pay the funeral expenses, and that such payment was not, nor was the clause in Mrs. Lee's will, a waiver of the right to have the husband's estate make reimbursement. We concur in his conclusions, and the decree under review is therefore affirmed.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.