From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camargo v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:21-cv-0192 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0192 JAM DB P

07-29-2021

ADRIAN MADRIGAL CAMARGO, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On June 1, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 1, 2021, are adopted in full;
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed for petitioner's failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. See E.D. Cal. R. 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41.
3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.


Summaries of

Camargo v. Unknown

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 29, 2021
2:21-cv-0192 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Camargo v. Unknown

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN MADRIGAL CAMARGO, Petitioner, v. UNKNOWN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 29, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0192 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2021)