From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camacho v. Uppal

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
21-cv-09026-NC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)

Opinion

21-cv-09026-NC

01-30-2023

VIRIDIANA CAMACHO and JIMENA DEL ANGEL, a minor by and through his GAL ADAN DEL ANGEL NERIS, Plaintiffs, v. BUTA UPPAL, CANADA ROAD CARRIER, LTD., Defendants.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

RE: DKT. NO. 34

NATHANAEL M.COUSINS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Camacho v. Uppal

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
21-cv-09026-NC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Camacho v. Uppal

Case Details

Full title:VIRIDIANA CAMACHO and JIMENA DEL ANGEL, a minor by and through his GAL…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 30, 2023

Citations

21-cv-09026-NC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)