From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Camacho v. Camacho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J.

Present — Fallon, J.P., Wesley, Doerr, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding plaintiff maintenance of $150 per week for 12 years or until plaintiff begins receiving Social Security benefits, whichever shall occur first (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [a]; Loeb v Loeb, 186 A.D.2d 174, 175).

The record does not support defendant's contention that the Referee failed to take into account the tax consequences to each party upon the distribution of marital assets (see, Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [5] [d] [10]).

Finally, defendant contends that it was error for the Referee to find that the marital residence had an agreed appraised value of $100,000. Having failed to contest the Referee's report and the judgment entered thereon at Supreme Court, defendant cannot challenge that finding on appeal (see, Marine Midland Bank v Brown, 115 A.D.2d 523, 524, lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 607).


Summaries of

Camacho v. Camacho

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 28, 1995
214 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Camacho v. Camacho

Case Details

Full title:MARIA CAMACHO, Respondent, v. ANDRE CAMACHO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
627 N.Y.S.2d 593