From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calzada v. Williamson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 24, 2023
2:22-cv-02050-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02050-GMN-NJK

02-24-2023

ANTHONY CALZADA, Plaintiffs, v. LARRY WILLIAMSON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 8]

NANCY J. KOPPE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court are USM 285 forms that Plaintiff filed on the docket, presumably seeking to have service effectuated on Defendants by the United States Marshal Service. Docket No. 8. Plaintiff paid the filing fee in this case and, as a result, is not proceeding in forma pauperis. As such, United States District Judge Gloria M. Navarro has ordered that “Plaintiff is responsible for completing service within 90 days.” Docket No. 6 at 7. If Plaintiff seeks to have service completed by the United States Marshal Service, he must file a motion that explains why such relief is warranted in this case. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3). Because no order has issued authorizing service by the United States Marshal Service, the USM 285 forms at Docket No. 8 are hereby STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Calzada v. Williamson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 24, 2023
2:22-cv-02050-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Calzada v. Williamson

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CALZADA, Plaintiffs, v. LARRY WILLIAMSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-02050-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Feb. 24, 2023)