From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calvin v. Brazelton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 16, 2015
ED CV 13-00735-VBF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)

Opinion

          Manuel Louis Calvin, Petitioner, Pro se, Corcoran, CA.

          For Brazelton, Warden, Respondent: Matthew C Mulford, LEAD ATTORNEY, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, San Diego, CA.


          ORDER

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior United States District Judge.

         Adopting the Report & Recommendation, Denying the Habeas Petition, and Dismissing the Action with Prejudice

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the habeas corpus petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation (" R& R") of the Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed objections to the R& R.

         The R& R is ADOPTED. The habeas corpus petition is denied.

         As required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 58(a), final judgment will be entered by separate document. This action is dismissed with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge issued concurrently herewith, final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent and against petitioner Manuel Louis Calvin.


Summaries of

Calvin v. Brazelton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 16, 2015
ED CV 13-00735-VBF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Calvin v. Brazelton

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL LOUIS CALVIN, Petitioner, v. P.D. BRAZELTON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 16, 2015

Citations

ED CV 13-00735-VBF (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2015)