From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callum v. Austin Capital Bank

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-01484-JAM-CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01484-JAM-CKD PS

12-20-2021

GARLAND CALLUM, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN CAPITAL BANK, Defendant.


ORDER

(ECF NO. 10)

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On November 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. No. objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 10) are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Callum v. Austin Capital Bank

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2021
2:21-cv-01484-JAM-CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Callum v. Austin Capital Bank

Case Details

Full title:GARLAND CALLUM, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN CAPITAL BANK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01484-JAM-CKD PS (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2021)