From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

CALLOWAY v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2907 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2907 EFB P.

May 11, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and is before the undersigned pursuant to plaintiff's consent. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; see also E.D. Cal. Local Rules, Appx. A, at (k)(4).

By order filed April 7, 2011, the court found that plaintiff had stated sufficient allegations against defendants Andreason and Vale. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed against these defendants only or file an amended complaint to attempt to state cognizable claims against defendants Hubbard, McKenzie, and Grannis. The court also informed plaintiff that the court would consider his decision to proceed only as to his claims against Andreason and Vale, as consent to the dismissal of plaintiff's defective claims against defendants Hubbard, McKenzie, and Grannis without prejudice. On April 29, 2011, plaintiff returned documents for service against defendants Andreason and Vale and consented to the dismissal of defendants Hubbard, McKenzie, and Grannis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Hubbard, McKenzie, and Grannis, are dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

CALLOWAY v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 11, 2011
No. CIV S-09-2907 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)
Case details for

CALLOWAY v. VEAL

Case Details

Full title:JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. M. VEAL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 11, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-2907 EFB P (E.D. Cal. May. 11, 2011)