From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calloway v. Dipaola

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 25, 2011
Case No. 3:08-cv-257-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cv-257-KRG-KAP.

March 25, 2011


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on February 25, 2011, docket no. 72, recommending that summary judgment be granted in part to defendants on defendants' motion, docket no. 53, and that plaintiff's cross motion, docket no. 50, be denied.

The parties were notified pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), that they had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. No one filed objections and the time to do so has expired.

Upon review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and noting the lack of timely objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2011, it is

ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment, docket no. 53, is granted in part, and plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment, docket no. 50, is denied. Judgment is ordered in favor of defendants Heidler and Plummer, and they are dismissed from this action. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Calloway v. Dipaola

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 25, 2011
Case No. 3:08-cv-257-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Calloway v. Dipaola

Case Details

Full title:EDMOUND CALLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. DENNY DiPAOLA, KEN PLUMMER, and GREG…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 25, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cv-257-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2011)