From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calloway v. Calloway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 2005
17 A.D.3d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5961, 5961A.

April 28, 2005.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura E. Drager, J.), entered October 16 and November 1, 2002, which denied defendant's motions to vacate a marital agreement dated December 20, 1995, that was incorporated but not merged into a judgment of divorce entered December 23, 1997, and to impose a constructive trust on certain Massachusetts properties allegedly owned by plaintiff and for damages, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Tyrone Calloway, appellant pro se.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Williams and Catterson, JJ.


In this postdivorce matrimonial action, the pro se defendant failed to explain properly why supposedly newly discovered evidence was not known at the time of prior postdivorce litigation in 2001, or to offer "reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion" (CPLR 2221 [e] [3]). We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them without merit.


Summaries of

Calloway v. Calloway

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 2005
17 A.D.3d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Calloway v. Calloway

Case Details

Full title:VALERIA CALLOWAY, Respondent, v. TYRONE CALLOWAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 2005

Citations

17 A.D.3d 286 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
792 N.Y.S.2d 902

Citing Cases

Yebo v. Cuadra

Nevertheless, a motion for leave to renew “is not a second chance freely given to parties who have not…

Mulholland v. Grant

Defendant, who explicitly consented to the divorce on the basis of plaintiff's testimony at the 2002 inquest…