From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calloway v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 4, 2022
2:16-CV-2532-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)

Opinion

2:16-CV-2532-WBS-DMC-P

10-04-2022

JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion, ECF No. 47, for reconsideration of the Magistrate Judge's order at ECF No. 44 denying appointment of counsel.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(f), a Magistrate Judge's order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that it does not appear that the Magistrate Judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The order at ECF No. 44 is, therefore, affirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 47, is denied; and

2. The Magistrate Judge's order at ECF No. 44 is affirmed.


Summaries of

Calloway v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 4, 2022
2:16-CV-2532-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)
Case details for

Calloway v. Cal. Dep't of Corr. & Rehab.

Case Details

Full title:JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 4, 2022

Citations

2:16-CV-2532-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2022)