From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callis v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 19, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00408-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 19, 2019)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00408-CR

09-19-2019

REGINALD ANDRE CALLIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


On appeal from the 24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Reginald Andre Callis, has filed a notice of appeal for "Illegal Sentence and/or Void Judgment." Appellant was convicted of possession with intent to deliver cocaine on June 17, 2008 in trial court cause number 08-3-7806. This Court previously issued a memorandum opinion and judgment on October 16, 2008, regarding this same cause number.

This Court dismissed the appeal because the trial court's certification did not show the defendant had the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On August 26, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal was taken was not an appealable order and requested correction of this defect within ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has responded by filing a "Motion for Inclusion into the Record the Order Denying Relief from a Fundamental Defect which Renders the Sentence Illegal and Conviction Void."

This Court lacks jurisdiction to consider a second appeal from appellant's final conviction. The exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure 11.07. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 5 (providing that "[a]fter conviction, the procedure outlined in this Act shall be exclusive and any other proceeding shall be void and of no force and effect in discharging the prisoner"); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S. W.2d 241 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.42.3(a), 43.2(f). All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

JAIME TIJERINA,

Justice Do not publish.
TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 19th day of September, 2019.


Summaries of

Callis v. State

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Sep 19, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00408-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Callis v. State

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD ANDRE CALLIS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Sep 19, 2019

Citations

NUMBER 13-19-00408-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 19, 2019)

Citing Cases

In re Reginald Andre Callis

See, e.g., In re Callis, No. 13-22-00255-CR, 2022 WL 1916692, at *1 (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi-Edinburg June…

In re Callis

Relator has filed other appeals and original proceedings arising from the same or related trial court cause…