holding that a similar preference clause in the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C. § 485h(c), applied to sales of thermally generated electrical power
Summary of this case from Central Lincoln Peoples' Uti. Dist. v. JohnsonNo. 75-773.
April 5, 1976.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 519 F.2d 184.
holding that a similar preference clause in the Reclamation Project Act of 1939, 43 U.S.C. § 485h(c), applied to sales of thermally generated electrical power
Summary of this case from Central Lincoln Peoples' Uti. Dist. v. Johnsonholding the preference clause applicable to the sale of thermal-generated power; holding that Congress had not waived the application of the preference clause to the Central Arizona Project; and holding that the sale of power was reviewable under the Administrative Procedure Act. The case was reversed and remanded to determine whether the preference clause was violated and whether any such violation was excused
Summary of this case from City of Anaheim, Cal. v. Duncanallowing repayment for legal fees only if defendants prevail
Summary of this case from Leigh v. EngleFull title:CALLEY v. HOFFMAN, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Apr 5, 1976
In re Gabel, 350 F. Supp. 624, 627 (C.D.Cal. 1972), vacated sub nom. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United States…
Gabauer v. WoodcockB. We believe that the trial court properly followed McNamara v. Johnston, 522 F.2d 1157 (7th Cir. 1975),…