From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calles-Rodas v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 26, 2007
256 F. App'x 145 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-73911.

Submitted November 13, 2007.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed November 26, 2007.

Hector Moises Calles-Rodas, Pittsburg, CA, pro se.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Jesse Bless, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A29-137-351.

Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Hector Moises Calles-Rodas, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge's denial of his applications for special rule cancellation of removal under NACARA, asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture.

Petitioner fails to argue any issues in his opening brief with this court. Because "[i]ssues raised in a brief that are not supported by argument are deemed abandoned," Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996), petitioner has waived his challenge to the BIA's decision.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Calles-Rodas v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 26, 2007
256 F. App'x 145 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Calles-Rodas v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Hector Moises CALLES-RODAS, Petitioner, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 26, 2007

Citations

256 F. App'x 145 (9th Cir. 2007)