From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calleja v. Calleja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1985
108 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

February 19, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kelly, J., Roncallo, J.).


Judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, and order affirmed, with one bill of costs.

We find that Special Term's awards of maintenance, child support, and counsel fees constituted a proper exercise of its discretion ( see, Silver v Silver, 63 A.D.2d 1017; Smith v Smith, 61 A.D.2d 1133). We also find that contrary to the defendant husband's claim, Special Term sufficiently set forth the factors it considered in rendering its maintenance and child support awards (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [6] [b]; [7] [b]; cf. Hornbeck v Hornbeck, 99 A.D.2d 851; Nielsen v Nielsen, 91 A.D.2d 1016). Titone, J.P., Mangano, Gibbons and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Calleja v. Calleja

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 19, 1985
108 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Calleja v. Calleja

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE CALLEJA, Respondent, v. ROBERT CALLEJA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1985

Citations

108 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Bartal v. Bartal

It was, therefore, a proper exercise of the trial court's broad discretion for it to grant the plaintiff a…