From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callanan v. Keeseville, Ausable Chasm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1910
136 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

January, 1910.


Plaintiff's application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Upon such appeal the following question is certified: Was the relief properly conditioned on payment or provision for payment of the expenditures made after action brought? If plaintiff, pursuant to the permission granted, appeals to the Court of Appeals within thirty days, the time within which plaintiff must elect whether he will comply with the conditions specified as provided in the 13th paragraph of the interlocutory judgment is extended to thirty days after the determination by the Court of Appeals of the appeal so taken. Application of the defendant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Upon such appeal the following questions are certified: I. Was the judgment authorized by the evidence and findings of the referee? II. Is the judgment secundum allegata? III. Did the reception in evidence of conversations between Powers and Mansfield, or either of them, and the officers and directors of the railroad company before and at the time of the making of the contract, as detailed at folios 2712, 3130, 3137, 3140, 3898, 3904, 3915, 3916, 4102, 4105, 5556, over the objection and exception of the defendants Powers and Mansfield, constitute reversible error?


Summaries of

Callanan v. Keeseville, Ausable Chasm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 1, 1910
136 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

Callanan v. Keeseville, Ausable Chasm

Case Details

Full title:Michael J. Callanan, Suing Individually and in Behalf of Other…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1910

Citations

136 App. Div. 934 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)