From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callanan Road Improvement v. Town of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

April 21, 1958

Present — Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Beldock, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ. [ 6 Misc.2d 1071.]


In an action for a judgment declaring an amendment to the Building Zone Ordinance of the Town of Newburgh to be void and of no effect, and for other relief, the appeal is (1) from an order granting a motion for summary judgment striking out the answer, and (2) from the judgment entered thereon declaring said amendment to be null and of no effect. The amendment prohibited quarrying of stone or minerals in the town, except within a certain area thereof. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The zoning amendment was not adopted in conformity with the provisions of section 264 Town of the Town Law in that the amendment was substantially different from the proposed amendment as set forth in the notice of hearing which was given prior to the enactment of the amendment (cf. Village of Mill Neck v. Nolan, 259 N.Y. 596; Village of Sands Point v. Sands Point Country Day School, 2 Misc.2d 885, affd. 2 A.D.2d 769; Matter of Paliotto v. Cohalan, 6 Misc.2d 1). We do not pass on the further questions which have been raised.


Summaries of

Callanan Road Improvement v. Town of Newburgh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 21, 1958
5 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Callanan Road Improvement v. Town of Newburgh

Case Details

Full title:CALLANAN ROAD IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, Respondent, v. TOWN OF NEWBURGH et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 21, 1958

Citations

5 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

People v. Dodge

It may also be assumed that the board were aware that if notice of the material provisions of the proposed…

Benson Point Realty Co v. Town of East Hampton

The notice must "fairly apprise[] the public of the fundamental character of the proposed zoning change [and]…