From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callahan v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 13, 1949
42 So. 2d 534 (Ala. 1949)

Opinion

7 Div. 963.

October 13, 1949.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Clair County, W. M. Rayburn, J.

Embry Embry, of Pell City, for appellant.

W. T. Starnes, of Pell City, for appellees.


Consideration of the motion to strike the transcript of the evidence commands attention first and is dispositive of the appeal. The transcript was not filed until 183 days after the rendition of the judgment and the motion to strike must be sustained. Dewrell v. Kearley, 250 Ala. 18, 32 So.2d 812; General Acts 1943, p. 423, Supreme Court Rule 48, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix.

Since the matters sought to be reviewed relate to questions of evidence, with the transcript stricken, no further consideration may be tendered the appeal and the judgment must be affirmed.

Motion to strike granted and judgment affirmed.

BROWN, FOSTER, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Callahan v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama
Oct 13, 1949
42 So. 2d 534 (Ala. 1949)
Case details for

Callahan v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:CALLAHAN v. THOMAS et al

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Oct 13, 1949

Citations

42 So. 2d 534 (Ala. 1949)
42 So. 2d 534

Citing Cases

State v. Bear Bros

Files Crenshaw and Jack Crenshaw, of Montgomery, for appellees. Where transcript of evidence is not filed…

Jones v. Thomas

We think the motion to strike the transcript of the evidence is well taken and must be sustained. Callahan v.…