From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callahan v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1897
17 App. Div. 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)

Opinion

May Term, 1897.

John L. Henning and John J. Healey, Jr., for the appellant.

Willard J. Miner, for the respondent.


The rendition of the plaintiff's bill to the defendant, her payment thereon of five dollars and proposal to settle the same for twenty dollars, are relied upon to establish an account stated between the parties.

We do not think the facts proved are, under the circumstances of this case, sufficient to establish an account stated between the parties.

The plaintiff's own evidence shows that all the services rendered by him were for the defendant's husband personally; there is no pretense that the defendant ever employed him, or in any way suggested or requested that he attend her husband. There were never any dealings between the plaintiff and defendant prior to her husband's death; there was no legal or equitable claim upon the defendant by the plaintiff, and hence there was nothing upon which an account could be stated. ( Field v. Knapp, 108 N.Y. 87.)

The judgment should, therefore, be reversed.

All concurred.

Judgment of the County Court and of the justice reversed, with costs and disbursements of this appeal and costs and disbursements in the courts below.


Summaries of

Callahan v. O'Rourke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1897
17 App. Div. 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
Case details for

Callahan v. O'Rourke

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. CALLAHAN, Respondent, v . MARGARET O'ROURKE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1897

Citations

17 App. Div. 277 (N.Y. App. Div. 1897)
45 N.Y.S. 764

Citing Cases

Walker v. Pixley

The naked promise to pay her husband's debt did not make her liable in the absence of any consideration…