From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Callahan v. Cambron

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 16, 1984
445 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 82-1548.

February 16, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Frederick T. Pfeiffer, J.

James K. Freeland, Orlando, for appellant.

J. Thomas Bowden, Orlando, for appellee.


The father appeals an order modifying an earlier award of custody, and granting custody of two minor children to the mother. We affirm because there is substantial competent evidence, although somewhat conflicting, to support the trial judge's finding that there was a substantial change in circumstances of the parties and that it would be in the best interest of the children to change custody to the mother. There is evidence to support the finding that since the original custody award based on the stipulation of the parties, the mother's circumstances have improved considerably while the father's physical and financial circumstances have sharply deteriorated. Cf. Ritsi v. Ritsi, 160 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964). Additionally, while certainly not binding, the trial court had the right to consider, along with other evidence, testimony of the children expressing their wish to live with their mother.

We find no abuse of the trial court's discretion and the order appealed from is therefore

AFFIRMED.

COBB and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Callahan v. Cambron

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 16, 1984
445 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Callahan v. Cambron

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CALLAHAN, APPELLANT, v. ARLENE CAMBRON, F/K/A ARLENE CALLAHAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 16, 1984

Citations

445 So. 2d 394 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Iannone v. Iannone

The Florida Supreme Court and all the district courts consistently hold that a party seeking to modify a…

Barnes v. Frazier

In selecting Frazier, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d…