From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calinicas v. Fulton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

November, 1934.


Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint in an action for personal injuries on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice provides that the motion must be made within twenty days after service of the complaint. Here it was not made until September 25, 1934, and, therefore, was not timely. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Calinicas v. Fulton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1934
242 App. Div. 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Calinicas v. Fulton

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW CALINICAS, Respondent, v. TRAVIS FULTON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1934

Citations

242 App. Div. 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Citing Cases

Blessington v. McCrory Stores Corp.

There is no question that the original motions made by the defendants under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil…

Ace Tackless Corp. v. Fuhrman

I am constrained to find that defendants' delay in making the present application, beyond the 20-day period…