From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California v. United States Dep't of Agriculture

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 11, 2012
Case No. CIV 05-00211 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. CIV 05-00211 MCE GGH

01-11-2012

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. KAMALA D. HARRIS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al. Defendants. SIERRA FOREST LEGACY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. HARRIS SHERMAN, in his official capacity as Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al., Defendants.

KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California JANILL L. RICHARDS Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorney for the People of the State of California, ex. rel. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General GREGORY C. LOARIE MICHAEL R. SHERWOOD Earthjustice PATRICK GALLAGHER Sierra Club Environmental Law Program Attorneys for Sierra Forest Legacy, et al. IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General BARCLAY T. SAMFORD Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Natural Resources Section Attorneys for Federal Defendants


KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

MARK BRECKLER

Chief Assistant Attorney General

JANILL L. RICHARDS, State Bar No. 173817

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

HARRISON M. POLLAK, State Bar No. 200879

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for the People of the State of California,

ex. rel. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE

Case No. CIV S-05-0205 MCE GGH

Plaintiffs and Defendants in related cases People of the State of California, ex rel. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al., Case No. CIV 0500211 MCE GGH ("California case") and Sierra Forest Legacy, et al., v. Harris Sherman, in his official capacity as Under Secretary for Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al., Case No. S-05-0205 MCE GGH ("Sierra Forest Legacy case"), respectfully submit this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Setting Briefing Schedule to address all issues remaining in this case on remand.

The parties stipulate as follows:

1. On or before February 3, 2012, (1) the parties in the Sierra Forest Legacy case will advise the Court of the legal effect of the Forest Service's December 19, 2011 withdrawal of the Basin Project Decision and Finding of No Significant Impact on Plaintiffs' claims under the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) or, alternatively, (2) the Forest Service will file a motion to dismiss the NFMA claims as moot.

2. On or before March 30, 2012, the Parties shall file concurrent opening briefs on the issue of remedy. The briefs shall not exceed 20 pages, excluding any supporting declarations.

3. On or before May 18, 2012, the Parties may file concurrent responding briefs. The briefs shall not exceed 20 pages, excluding any supporting declarations.

4. The matter shall be heard on June 14, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

KAMALA D. HARRIS

Attorney General of California

JANILL L. RICHARDS

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for the People of the State of

California, ex. rel. Kamala D. Harris,

Attorney General

GREGORY C. LOARIE

MICHAEL R. SHERWOOD

Earthjustice

PATRICK GALLAGHER

Sierra Club Environmental Law Program

Attorneys for Sierra Forest Legacy, et al.

IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

BARCLAY T. SAMFORD

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Environment & Natural Resources Division

Natural Resources Section

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

ORDER

1. On or before February 3, 2012, (1) the parties in the Sierra Forest Legacy case will advise the Court of the legal effect of the Forest Service's December 19, 2011 withdrawal of the Basin Project Decision and Finding of No Significant Impact on Plaintiffs' claims under the National Forest Management Act (NFMA) or, alternatively, (2) the Forest Service will file a motion to dismiss the NFMA claims as moot.

2. On or before March 30, 2012, the Parties shall file concurrent opening briefs on the issue of remedy. The briefs shall not exceed 20 pages, excluding any supporting declarations.

3. On or before May 18, 2012, the Parties may file concurrent responding briefs. The briefs shall not exceed 20 pages, excluding any supporting declarations.

4. The matter shall be heard on June 14, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

California v. United States Dep't of Agriculture

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Jan 11, 2012
Case No. CIV 05-00211 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

California v. United States Dep't of Agriculture

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. KAMALA D. HARRIS, ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

Case No. CIV 05-00211 MCE GGH (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2012)