From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Beard

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 4, 2015
2:13-CV-00840-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2015)

Opinion

          ANDREW L. PACKARD, MEGAN E. TRUXILLO, JOHN J. PRAGER, Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard, Petaluma, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff, CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE.

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of California, GAVIN G.MCCABE, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, ELLYN S. LEVINSON, Deputy Attorney General, DANIEL S. HARRIS, Attorneys for Defendant, Jeffrey Beard, in his official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.


          STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(2)]

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("CSPA") and Defendant Jeffrey Beard, in his official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("Defendant") in the above-captioned action, stipulate as follows:

         WHEREAS, on or about February 8, 2013, CSPA provided Defendant with a Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit ("60-Day Notice Letter") under Section 505 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Act" or "Clean Water Act"), 33 U.S.C. § 1365;

         WHEREAS, on April 29, 2013 CSPA filed its Complaint against Defendant in this Court, and said Complaint incorporated by reference all of the allegations contained in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter;

         WHEREAS, CSPA and Defendant, through their authorized representatives and without either adjudication of CSPA's claims or admission by Defendant of any alleged violation or other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations of CSPA as set forth in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of further litigation. A copy of the Parties' proposed consent judgment ("Consent Judgment") entered into by and between CSPA and Defendant is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference;

         WHEREAS, CSPA has submitted the Consent Judgment via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice ("the agencies") and the 45-day review period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has now expired;

         NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the Parties that CSPA's claims, as set forth in its 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Parties respectfully request an order from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In accordance with Paragraph 16 of the Consent Judgment, the Parties also request that this Court retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties through September 30, 2017, for the sole purpose of resolving any disputes between the Parties arising under the Consent Judgment.

          ORDER

         Good cause appearing, and the Parties having stipulated and agreed,

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE's claims against Defendant JEFFREY BEARD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, as set forth in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own attorney fees and costs, except as provided for by the terms of the accompanying Consent Judgment.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties solely for the purpose of resolving disputes arising under the Consent Judgment attached to the Parties' Stipulation to Dismiss as Exhibit A until September 30, 2017.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Beard

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 4, 2015
2:13-CV-00840-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2015)
Case details for

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Beard

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 4, 2015

Citations

2:13-CV-00840-GEB-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 4, 2015)