From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California Sportfishing Prot. Alliance v. Siemens Water Techs. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Aug 5, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00413- JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-00413- JAM-DAD

08-05-2011

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, Plaintiff, v. SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendant.

ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690) ERIK M. ROPER (State Bar No. 259756) Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard ROBERT J. TUERCK (State Bar No. 255741) Jackson & Tuerck Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE. DANIEL M. BRIAN (State Bar No. 262485) Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. Attorney for Defendant SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.


ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690)

ERIK M. ROPER (State Bar No. 259756)

Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard

ROBERT J. TUERCK (State Bar No. 255741)

Jackson & Tuerck

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE.

DANIEL M. BRIAN (State Bar No. 262485)

Beveridge & Diamond, P.C.

Attorney for Defendant

SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

NOTICE AND STIPULATION OF TIME EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT

Date: August 5, 2011

Judge: Judge John A. Mendez

[Complaint Filed: February 24, 2011]

TO THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("CSPA") and Defendant Siemens Water Technologies Corp. have agreed to enter into a Consent Agreement to settle the allegations set forth in CSPA's Complaint. A copy of the Consent Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Under 40 C.F.R. § 135.5, the Consent Agreement is subject to a 45-day review by the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice. The review period is scheduled to expire on September 5, 2011, 28 days after Siemens' Answer is due. To accommodate the United States' review of the Consent Agreement, the parties hereby stipulate, pursuant to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California, Rule 144(a), to extend the deadline for Defendant's Answer from August 8, 2011 to October 17, 2011.

LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD

By: Erik M. Roper (as authorized on

August 4, 2011)

Erik M. Roper

Attorney for Plaintiff

California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

BEVERIDGE & DIAMOND, PC.

By: /s/ Daniel M. Brian

Daniel M. Brian

Attorney for Defendant

Siemens Water Technologies Corp.

ORDER

This Court, having duly considered Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's and Defendant Siemens Water Technologies Corp.'s notice and stipulation to extend the deadline for Defendant's Answer from August 8, 2011 to October 17, 2011, hereby orders that the time extension be GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

California Sportfishing Prot. Alliance v. Siemens Water Techs. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Aug 5, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-00413- JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)
Case details for

California Sportfishing Prot. Alliance v. Siemens Water Techs. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, Plaintiff, v. SIEMENS WATER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Aug 5, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-00413- JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2011)