From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

California Sportfishing Prot. Alliance v. Int'l Paper Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01126-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-CV-01126-JAM-DAD

09-08-2011

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, a New York corporation, PAUL GALEA, an individual, and CLARK WEISS, an individual, Defendants.

LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD Erik M. Roper Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY Brian E. Heim, Chief Counsel, Environmental Law International Paper Company Attorneys for Defendants INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, et al


ANDREW L. PACKARD (State Bar No. 168690)

ERIK ROPER (State Bar No. 259756)

Law Offices of Andrew L. Packard

ROBERT J. TUERCK (State Bar No. 255741)

Jackson & Tuerck

Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA

SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE

STIPULATION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITH

PREJUDICE; ORDER GRANTING

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP

41(a)(2)]
TO THE COURT:

Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("CSPA"), and Defendants International Paper Company, Mr. Paul Galea and Mr. Clark Weiss ("Defendants") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on or about February 25, 2011, CSPA provided Defendants with a Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit ("60-Day Notice Letter") under Section 505 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Act" or "Clean Water Act"), 33 U.S.C. § 1365;

WHEREAS, on April 27, 2011, CSPA filed its Complaint against Defendants in this Court, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. City of Chico, (USDC, E.D. Cal., Case No. 2:11-CV-01126-JAM-DAD) and said Complaint incorporated by reference all of the allegations contained in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter;

WHEREAS, CSPA and Defendants, through their authorized representatives and without either adjudication of CSPA's claims or admission by Defendants of any alleged violation or other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations of CSPA as set forth in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of further litigation. A copy of the agreement ("Consent Agreement") entered into by and between CSPA and Defendants is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.

WHEREAS, CSPA submitted the Consent Agreement via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice ("the agencies") and the 45-day review period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has been completed without objection by the agencies.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the Parties that CSPA's claims, as set forth in its 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Parties respectfully request an order from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In accordance with Clause 16 of the Consent Agreement, the Parties also request that this Court retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties through September 30, 2013, for the sole purpose of resolving any disputes between the parties with respect to enforcement of any provision of the Consent Agreement.

LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD

Erik M. Roper

Attorneys for Plaintiff

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION

ALLIANCE

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY

Brian E. Heim, Chief Counsel, Environmental Law

International Paper Company

Attorneys for Defendants

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, et al

ORDER

Good cause appearing, and the Parties having stipulated and agreed,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's claims against Defendants International Paper Company, Paul Galea and Clark Weiss as set forth in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint filed in Case No. 2:11-CV-01126-JAM-DAD, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties with respect to disputes arising under the Consent Agreement attached to the Parties' Stipulation to Dismiss as Exhibit A.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

John A. Mendez

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

California Sportfishing Prot. Alliance v. Int'l Paper Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2011
Case No. 2:11-CV-01126-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)
Case details for

California Sportfishing Prot. Alliance v. Int'l Paper Co.

Case Details

Full title:CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a non profit corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-CV-01126-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2011)