Opinion
Page, McCutchen & Eels, for complainant.
Henley & Costello, for respondent.
MORROW, District Judge.
This case presents substantially the same question as were raised in the case of California Redwood Co. v. Litle (No. 11,812: just decided) 79 F. 854; and upon the authority of that case, and of the case of Mortgage Co. v. Hopper, 12 C.C.A. 293, 64 F. 553, the bill will be dismissed, with costs.