Summary
upholding a jury award for fraud and denying the disclaimer of any warranties where the defendant sold the plaintiff a car it claimed was a "used 1974 Celica Toyota coupe" that, in actuality, was a half of a previously totaled Celica Toyota coupe welded to an unidentified vehicle
Summary of this case from Boyd v. TTI Floorcare N. Am.Opinion
65057.
DECIDED OCTOBER 14, 1982.
Drug violation. Tift Superior Court. Before Judge Crosby.
David E. Perry, for appellant.
Thomas H. Pittman, District Attorney, for appellee.
Defendant appeals his conviction for the sale of cocaine. His appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 ( 87 SC 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered arguably could support an appeal. In addition, as required by Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 ( 229 S.E.2d 406), we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We are in agreement with counsel that the points raised are not meritorious and an independent examination discloses no errors of any substance. Therefore, this court grants the motion to withdraw and we affirm the conviction. The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant's guilt of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 ( 264 S.E.2d 528).
Judgment affirmed. Shulman, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.