From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calhoun v. Google LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
20-cv-05146-LHK (SVK) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-05146-LHK (SVK)

09-30-2021

PATRICK CALHOUN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ON MOTIONS TO SEAL

RE: DKT. NOS. 273, 280, 288, 289, 293, 296, 308, 313

SUSAN VAN KEULEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Before the Court are several administrative motions to file under seal materials associated with discovery disputes in this case. Dkt. 273, 280, 288, 289, 293, 296, 308, 313; see also Dkt. 284, 291, 295.

Courts recognize a “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). A request to seal court records therefore starts with a “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The standard for overcoming the presumption of public access to court records depends on the purpose for which the records are filed with the court. A party seeking to seal court records relating to motions that are “more than tangentially related to the underlying cause of action” must demonstrate “compelling reasons” that support secrecy. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). For records attached to motions that re “not related, or only tangentially related, to the merits of the case, ” the lower “good cause” standard of Rule 26(c) applies. Id.; see also Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. A party moving to seal court records must also comply with the procedures established by Civil Local Rule 79-5.

Here, the “good cause” standard applies because the information the parties seek to seal was submitted to the Court in connection with discovery-related motions, rather than a motion that concerns the merits of the case. The Court may reach different conclusions regarding sealing these documents under different standards or in a different context. Having considered the motions to seal, supporting declarations, and the pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Dkt. 273

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Ruling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

Plaintiffs' Response to Google's Statement re Identification of Discovery Disputes for Resolution

GRANTED as to redacted portions at: Page 1, lines 24-26 Page 2, lines 9-11, 13-14, 18-20

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential technical information regarding the operations of Google's products and systems and confidential business information that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

2. Dkt. 280

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Ruling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

June 2, 2021 Hearing Transcript

GRANTED as to redacted portions at: 13:2, 13:8, 13:11, 32:18-20, 34:10, 34:23-25, 36:23-37:3, 37:8-11, 37:15-16, 37:19-20, 37:22-24, 38:3-5, 46:3-11, 46:14-15, 46:17-23, 46:25, 47:1, 70:20, 70:24, 71:2.

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential technical information regarding features of Google's internal systems and operations, including Google's internal policies, internal data structures, internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

3. Dkt. 288

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Ruling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

August 12, 2021 Hearing Transcript

GRANTED as to redacted portions at: 12:22-24; 14:3; 53:23

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential technical information regarding features of Google's internal systems and operations, including Google's internal data structures, internal identifiers and their proprietary functions, as well as plaintiff health information that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

4. Dkt. 289

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Rufjling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel, and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support thereof (Dkt. 290)

GRANTED as to redacted portions at: Page 1, Lines 20, 22-25, 28; Page 2, Lines 2-6, 11-14, 16-20, 22-23, 26-27; Page 3, Lines 24-27; Page 4, Lines 3

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential technical information regarding the operation of Google's products and systems, including information related to Google's internal project and Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas, State of Arizona, and the FTC in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Declaration of David A. Straite in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Dkt. 291)

GRANTED as to redacted portions at: Page 2, Lines 18-19, 21-22, 24-25, 27-28; Page 3, Lines 2-3, 11-12, 14-15, 17-18, 20-21, 23-26

Narrowly tailored to protect Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas, State of Arizona, and the FTC in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit A to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential technical information regarding the operation of Google's products and systems, including Google's logs, internal data structures, internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions and Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit B to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit C to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit D to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit E to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential technical information regarding the operation of Google's products and systems, including Google's logs, internal data structures, internal identifiers and projects, internal groups, and Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit F to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit I to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Arizona in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit J to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Arizona in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit K to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential technical information regarding the operation of Google's products and systems, including Google's internal identifiers and

projects and their proprietary functions, and Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Arizona in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Exhibit L to the Declaration of David A. Straite

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential technical information regarding the operation of Google's products and systems, including Google's internal identifiers, cookies, and projects and their proprietary functions and Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Arizona in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

Proposed Order on Motion to Compel

GRANTED as to Entire Document

Contains Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas, State of Arizona, and the FTC in confidence that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

5. Dkt. 293

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Ruling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

Joint Submission in Response to Dkt. 276 re Logs Preservation

GRANTED as to redacted portions at: page 2, lines 3-12;

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential technical information regarding features of Google's internal systems and

page 3, lines 3, 7-12, 16-18, 21-23, 25, 27; page 5, lines 9-16, 19, 24-25; page 6, lines 4-6, 8-13, 17-18, 28.

operations, including the various types of Google's data logs and information contained in those logs, internal data structures, internal identifiers and their proprietary functions, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

6. Dkt. 296

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Ruling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion To Compel Production of Regulator Documents Re: Dispute 1.4

GRANTED as to redacted portions at Page 2, lines 19-24; Page 3, lines 1-2

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential information regarding Google's products and systems, including the various types of Google's internal projects and identifiers as well as Google's confidential business information that was requested by the State of Texas and State of Arizona in confidence, which Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.

7. Dkt. 308

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Ruling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

September 8, 2021 Order (Dkt. 299)

GRANTED as to redacted portions at: page 2, line 20

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential business information related to Google's internal systems and related personnel which Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally

known to the public or Google's competitors

8. Dkt. 313

Document Sought to be Sealed

Court's Ruling on Motion to Seal

Reason(s) for Court's Ruling

Joint Submission in Response to Dkt. 262 re Status of Discovery Disputes

GRANTED as to redacted portions at 3, 4, 5, 10, 14

Narrowly tailored to protect confidential information regarding Google's products and systems, including details related to Google's internal cookies, identifiers, practices, and logs, including internal operations related to internal identifiers, as well as nonpublic regulatory investigations, which Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google's competitors.


Summaries of

Calhoun v. Google LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 30, 2021
20-cv-05146-LHK (SVK) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Calhoun v. Google LLC

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK CALHOUN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 30, 2021

Citations

20-cv-05146-LHK (SVK) (N.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2021)