From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calhoun v. Google LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
5:20-cv-05146-LHK-SVK (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

5:20-cv-05146-LHK-SVK

09-09-2021

PATRICK CALHOUN, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE LLC, Defendant.


Honorable Lucy H. Koh Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER APPOINTING COMMISSIONERS TO TAKE EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER II, ARTICLE 17 OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION OF 18 MARCH 1970 ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE ABROAD IN CIVIL OR COMMERCIAL MATTERS

HON. SUSAN van KEULEN United States Magistrate Judge

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the Joint Motion for Appointment of Commissioners to Take Evidence Pursuant to Chapter II, Article 17 of the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters (ECF No. 298), and supporting papers submitted by Plaintiffs and Defendant, Google LLC (“Google”)

HEREBY ORDERS THAT:

(a) The Joint Motion (ECF No. 298) is GRANTED;

(b) Pursuant to Article 17 of the Hague Convention, Remo Decurtins (the “Swiss Commissioner”), Lesley E. Weaver, and Josef Ansorge (together, the “Commissioners”) are duly appointed, pending the approval of the Swiss Federal Office of Justice (“FOJ”), as commissioners to take evidence in the above-captioned action, specifically in connection with the deposition of Tim Schumann in his individual capacity;

(c) This signed Order will be given to the counsel for the parties and the Swiss Commissioner who is directed to file it together with the necessary application for authorization from the relevant Swiss authorities within five (5) business days of the date of this order;

(d) Neither this Order, nor the terms of the Court's Request (which is incorporated into this Order) shall restrict the scope of discovery otherwise permissible under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(e) Neither this Order, nor the terms of the Court's Request (which is incorporated into this Order) shall constitute or operate as a waiver of the attorney-client privilege, the work product doctrine, or any other privileges, rights, or protections that may apply to evidence under the laws of Switzerland or the United States.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Calhoun v. Google LLC

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
5:20-cv-05146-LHK-SVK (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Calhoun v. Google LLC

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK CALHOUN, et al., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

5:20-cv-05146-LHK-SVK (N.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)