From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calhoun-El v. Maynard

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-7761.

Submitted: February 21, 2008.

Decided: February 27, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00220-RDB).

James A. Calhoun-El, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane Weber, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Katrina J. Dennis, Kramon Graham, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


James Calhoun-El appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Calhoun-El v. Maynard, No. 1:07-cv-00220-RDB (D. Md. filed Nov. 19, 2007 entered Nov. 20, 2007). We deny Calhoun-El's motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Calhoun-El v. Maynard

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 27, 2008
267 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Calhoun-El v. Maynard

Case Details

Full title:James A. CALHOUN-EL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MAYNARD, Acting…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 27, 2008

Citations

267 F. App'x 252 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Wright v. McCrory

Finally, although he does not specifically name any personal property he was deprived of, the court notes…

Patel v. Morin

Thus, plaintiff has not established a substantive due process violation. Calhoun-El v.Maynard, No.…