From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Calenture, LLC v. Shiff

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 2, 2024
23 Civ. 11238 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

23 Civ. 11238 (AT)

01-02-2024

CALENTURE, LLC and REVIVE INVESTING LLC, Plaintiffs, v. BARRY SHIFF, ALETA SHIFF, and SYMETRYX CORPORATION, Defendants, and NEUBASE THERAPEUTICS, INC., Nominal Defendant.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, DISTRICT JUDGE:

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Calenture, LLC v. Shiff

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 2, 2024
23 Civ. 11238 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Calenture, LLC v. Shiff

Case Details

Full title:CALENTURE, LLC and REVIVE INVESTING LLC, Plaintiffs, v. BARRY SHIFF, ALETA…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

23 Civ. 11238 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 2, 2024)