From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cale v. Cale

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 27, 1981
281 S.E.2d 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

61643.

DECIDED MAY 27, 1981.

Breach of contract; marriage. Forsyth Superior Court. Before Judge Neville.

Norman Cale, pro se. John P. Manton, for appellee.

Betty Jo Cale, pro se.


The trial court correctly ruled in this case that the plaintiff, appellant Cale, had stated no cause of action for which relief might be granted. Even assuming it had been error to fail to require that the proceedings below be recorded, the appellant shows no cause for complaint as he suggests nothing that occurred to obviate the correctness of the trial court's ruling on appellee's motion to dismiss, and therefore appellant has not shown that he has been harmed by any failure to record.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 36 of this court. Shulman, P. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 27, 1981 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Cale v. Cale

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 27, 1981
281 S.E.2d 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Cale v. Cale

Case Details

Full title:CALE v. CALE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 27, 1981

Citations

281 S.E.2d 645 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981)
158 Ga. App. 659

Citing Cases

Whatley v. Blue Cross of Georgia/Columbus, Inc.

Accordingly, this court, for the first time, has been given sufficient information concerning the appeal by…

Tomberlin Associates, Architects, Inc. v. Athens Bank & Trust

We dismissed the appeal because an additional claim based on quantum meruit remained pending in the trial…