From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caldwell v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 12, 2011
NO. 11-2813 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-2813.

December 12, 2011.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 12th day of December, 2011, upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Document No. 2), the defendant's response, and after oral argument, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and this matter is REMANDED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), to the state court from which it was removed.


Summaries of

Caldwell v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 12, 2011
NO. 11-2813 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2011)
Case details for

Caldwell v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JASMINE CALDWELL, a minor, by Denine Caldwell and Jason Caldwell, as…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 12, 2011

Citations

NO. 11-2813 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 12, 2011)