From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caldwell v. Smith-Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 13, 2021
194 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

530620

05-13-2021

In the Matter of Ricky CALDWELL, Appellant, v. Alicia SMITH-ROBERTS, as Director of Ministerial, Family and Volunteer Services, Respondent.

Ricky Caldwell, Ossining, appellant pro se. Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Allyson B. Levine of counsel), for respondent.


Ricky Caldwell, Ossining, appellant pro se.

Letitia James, Attorney General, Albany (Allyson B. Levine of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Rivera, J.), entered December 11, 2019 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision denying petitioner's request to participate in the family reunion program.

Petitioner is serving an aggregate sentence of 50 years to life due to his conviction for, among other things, attempted murder in the first degree, stemming from his shooting at police officers who were attempting to arrest him for auto theft. In February 2018, he applied to participate in the family reunion program (hereinafter FRP) with his spouse. Petitioner's application was subject to special review and was forwarded to the Central Office (see 7 NYCRR 220.2 [c]). The Central Office denied the application and the denial was upheld on administrative appeal.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the denial of his application. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that there was a rational basis for the denial of the application, and petitioner appealed. While this appeal was pending, petitioner filed another application to participate in the FRP with his spouse, which was also denied by the Central Office. Petitioner's subsequent FRP application renders his appeal of the denial of his February 2018 application moot and, as the narrow exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable, this appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Shapard v. Annucci, 177 A.D.3d 1048, 1050, 112 N.Y.S.3d 335 [2019] ; Matter of Fragosa v. Morris, 156 A.D.3d 1072, 1072, 65 N.Y.S.3d 486 [2017] ).

Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Clark, Aarons and Reynolds Fitzgerald, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

Caldwell v. Smith-Roberts

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 13, 2021
194 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Caldwell v. Smith-Roberts

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Ricky Caldwell, Appellant, v. Alicia Smith-Roberts, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: May 13, 2021

Citations

194 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 3091
143 N.Y.S.3d 922

Citing Cases

Rahman v. Galioto

this appeal moot. Although certain of our decisions imply that submission of a subsequent FRP application…