From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Caldwell v. Durham Area Transit Authority

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Apr 13, 2011
1:09CV628 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2011)

Opinion

1:09CV628.

April 13, 2011


ORDER


On August 21, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Trevor Sharp filed a Recommended Ruling in this case [Doc. # 3]. Judge Sharp recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) [Doc. # 1] be granted and that Plaintiff's Complaint [Doc. # 2] be dismissed with prejudice. Because there were no objections to the Recommendation, review is only for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Finding no error, the Court adopts in full the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.


Summaries of

Caldwell v. Durham Area Transit Authority

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Apr 13, 2011
1:09CV628 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Caldwell v. Durham Area Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:EMMETT W. CALDWELL, Plaintiff, pro se, v. DURHAM AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Date published: Apr 13, 2011

Citations

1:09CV628 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 13, 2011)